Lawful Rebellion – Voter Registration Form

For your information: Canvassers are on piece work. They have a target to reach. If they reach it they’re paid 60p per completed form. If not, they’re paid 40p per form … so when you get the aggressive ones, they aren’t aggressively trying to get your info because they think you have to supply it, they’re aggressively trying to earn big bucks ONLY! Remember that and keep the conversation in that area … for fun.

Consent of the governed?? Does anyone really believe that?

It’s within YOUR power to make that part of the definition of a statute a reality by, not filling in the voter registration form. It’s as SIMPLE as that!! You are taking away concent “physically” and by letting them know what you’re doing, make it a real “concept”, as opposed to just ignoring them. By ignoring them you fail to make them aware of the existence of the concept and so, it isn’t real to them and you haven’t removed consent in any meaningful way.

If no one knows about your “withdrawing” your consent, will it make any difference to the bigger picture? My brain processes say “not on your nelly”.

By not  filling out of the the VR form you are  retracting of your consent. By not registering you are making your lack of confidence in the “representative” known and also enforcing your chosen “removal” from the voting spectacle. So when and if you choose to register to vote, you will be governed by consent.

A state that FORCES a people to vote for governance is a tyrannical state. Threats of a fine for declining to “join in” is tyrannical. Threats of imprisonment for non-payment of the fine is tyrannical. Imprisonment for non-payment of the fine is tyrannical.

A new year, a new form, … and a new(ish) response:

Continue reading

Lawful Rebellion – John Hurst v Tyranny

… There is absolutely no doubt that sovereignty ultimately lies with the people of this country, through the sovereign and her coronation oath.

Mr. Flynn: The Queen?

Mr. Grieve: Yes, it lies with the Queen through her coronation oath to her subjects. That is what the oath is all about. It is worth re-reading.

Source: http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1997/jul/25/welsh-assembly#column_1176

Lastly, perhaps I may refer to an argument which has been developed more outside this House than it has inside; that is, to ratify this treaty would be both contrary to Magna Carta and a breach of the Coronation Oath, which sprang from the settlement of 1688. I find many of those arguments extremely persuasive. We are no longer being governed, as our constitution requires, in accordance with the traditional laws of England.

But I have to say to those who think that that is an insuperable bar to progress on this treaty: forget it. The courts of this country have always had an acute political perception. I am quite sure that if it was ever taken to court, the acute political perception of the members of our judiciary would ensure that, no matter what facts were laid before them, they would conclude that Parliament could do exactly what it liked, even signing its own death warrant. Of course this treaty is not Parliament’s death warrant. It is just another instalment on the way towards it.

Source: http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/lords/2001/nov/01/european-communities-amendment-bill#column_1585

 

“The Queen now compacts with her people, and before them, to govern according to the laws and customs of her realm …”

6:00 onwards:

She solemnly promised and swore an oath to govern by the laws and customs of our land.

The things which I have here before promised, I will perform and keep, so help me god.

Continue reading

Universal Declaration of Human Rights [Updated 23/09/2009]

Common sense tells us that present government only have “authority” because of past history, and that authority is the authority of the Conqueror. The authority to rule and govern the people of England in 1066 was TAKEN by FORCE… it was not GIVEN FREELY.

You can prove that authority should be GIVEN FREELY by reducing the human population down to just two people. If one person FORCEABLY TAKES authority WITHOUT the CONSENT of the other then that is TYRANNY. It’s that simple. Common sense.

All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood. – Article 1, Universal Declaration of Human Rights

William the Conqueror’s authority was TAKEN by (DEADLY) FORCE, (as his title implies and the history books boast) and is the same authority that the parliament of today have inherited. This tyrannical authority is what has evolved over time to what it is today. Its not quite so brutal (in the physical sense) as it once was, but mentally, it draws on the same fears using the same methods (threats, fines, kidnap and imprisonment (… and until very recently … death)). Its the exact same authority!! If it wasn’t, there would be a build in mechanism that deals with tyranny, cronyism and corruption within parliament … which is yet to come!

Real authority should be in the form of:

I trust you and I FREELY GIVE you the authority to do my bidding on the understanding that, if that trust is broken then so is this agreement, thus external authority is rescinded and denied.

… or something very much like that!

This is what we as the people of our country should be working toward. If we need a group of people to act as government or “representative’s” then we should GIVE them the authority FREELY because it’s the right thing to do and in OUR best interests.

On 10th December 1948 after the last war was “won”, the government of Britain signed a pledge on behalf of the people of this country, in recognition of the inalienable rights outlined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, also to observe, uphold, protect, and teach those rights in schools … they haven’t done that!

Now, therefore, The General Assembly proclaims

This Universal Declaration Of Human Rights as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.– Preamble, Universal Declaration of Human Rights

You have to ask your self “WHY NOT?”

Continue reading