Karl Lentz – UnKommonlaw

If you’ve never heard of him before you might (read will) enjoy this.

What do you think?

UK site: http://www.unkommonlaw.co.uk/
Blog: http://plaintiffmustappear.blogspot.co.uk/
Us site: http://www.broadmind.org/
Radio site: http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=127469&cmd=tc
YouTube sound bites: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5duR4OvEHHxOSdEZhANETw/videos

Nightmares at Elm Guest House – Bill Maloney Interviews Chris Fay

Keep up the good work Bill and Maria. 8-)
www.pienmashfilms.com

Anti child abuse activist and film maker Bill Maloney interviews Chris Fay, former national adult advisor to NAYPIC (National Association of Young People In Care) about the notorious ELM GUEST HOUSE and the many questions that remain un-investigated.
Special thanks to Chris Fay for his tireless and selfless support of child abuse victims and survivors.
Visit: http://www.pienmashfilms.com

The Elm Guest House child abuse scandal arose from claims of sexual abuse and the grooming of children by British politicians, at parties for men at the former Elm Guest House near Barnes Common in South West London during the late 1970s and 1980s.
An investigation, Operation Fairbank, which was led by the Metropolitan Police Service, started in late 2012. The investigation was a “scoping exercise” aimed at a “preliminary assessment of the evidence rather than a formal inquiry”. Existence of the operation was confirmed on 12 December 2012, after operating in secret for several weeks. A full criminal investigation, Operation Fernbridge, was launched in February 2013 as a result of allegations arising from Operation Fairbank.

Inequality_Is_OK Virus – The Anti-Virus

Having noticed a while back that I’ve tended to repost what is already on a lot of other sites, I decided it was pointless to continue to do so, and to only post when I have something original(ish) to say or share.

This I think is something worth sharing … or to be more precise and in context … SPREADING! :D

There is a concept that I’ve come across recently called a meme, which can be likened to a “mind virus”. It is a thought or a firmly held belief that spreads from one person to another. Mankind has been infected with the “inequality_is_OK” mind virus, with disastrous consequences.

Continue reading

Dying For Freedom


From: babs tucker
To: mayor@london.gov.uk ; cccmailbox-commissioner’ semail@met.police.uk ; akemal@westminster.gov.uk ; martin.forshaw@weightmans.com ; sarah.winfield@met.police.uk

Subject: Hunger Strike Started December 27th 2012.
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:02:24 +0000

Hunger Strike: Started on December 27th 2012.

My name is Babs Tucker.

****Freedom**** of Expression is the most important right you can exercise to bring about change peacefully.

I did not come to Parliament Square to die and I do not want to die. I came to Parliament Square because people everywhere are entitled to – live – in peace, without the constant illegal wars being waged by government.

I have been campaigning in Parliament Square, with Brian Haw’s Parliament Square Peace Campaign, 24/7 for seven years, during which time I have been unlawfully arrested 47 times and imprisoned twice without trial in Holloway Women’s Prison in North London.

Our campaign’s 24/7 presence reflects the fact that while wars rage and Parliament continues to only sit part-time, with many long breaks, the people do care about one another, all the time, in all weather.

We remind government that the horrendous brutality of the illegal wars have led to millions of innocent civilians suffering and dying in Iraq and Afghanistan.

On January 16th 2012, Westminster Council along with many Metropolitan Police endangered our lives by stealing our tents and their contents from Parliament Square in the middle of winter when the night time temperatures regularly plummet to well below zero degrees Celcius.

Continued here: http://www.brianhaw.tv/index.php/blog/1361-31122012-hunger-strike-started-27th-december-2012

There Exists Land With YOUR Name On It!

If you were offered a piece of land for free, that you are responsible for, and to do with as you see fit (within reason), would you accept it?

Well?

Changing the subject for a minute while you think about it, what does “all human beings are born equal” mean? … and … is it the truth?

All human beings are a product of nature first and foremost. Is this true? I think it seems to be. There is no favouritism in nature. This I think is also true because, if nature decides that a foetus isn’t going to reach full term then it doesn’t, full stop. Meaning, if there is any abnormality during growth that is severe enough, the unborn baby will die before it is born … regardless of who it’s parents are and where on Earth they are!

Continue reading

The System

Here is the trailer to and, the series of video’s entitled “The System”.

Part seven comes up as “Private Video”, maybe it hasn’t been made yet?! If or when it becomes available I’ll post it … or keep checking yourself http://www.youtube.com/user/broaderviewYT… enjoy.

THE SYSTEM – Trailer:

Continue reading

Mortgages – The Common Man Fights Back

I came across three interesting posts/articles in the past couple of weeks that I think everyone should be aware of, … especially if you’re faced with the dilemma of paying the mortgage or feeding your family.

Mortgages 1:
Here’s the simple (temporary) solution to keeping your home if the choice between keeping it and feeding your family becomes apparent.

I would imagine the same applies to ANY contract based debt!!

Official Offer

Offer to (bank) by (person) to now operate on account 123456 €?0.00 effected monthly as satisfaction on all account demands/obligations.

(Signed By:Person)

Rear of paper …. written at an angle across the page OFFICIAL OFFER

Attach Cheque made payable to (BANK)
If you get no response then the offer has been accepted … so the cheques keep going in to effect performance on the contract.

If a response comes … Look at it very carefully ! ! ! … This is where they may try to shift the attention away from the offer …. in an attempt to get their offer in place … If responded to carefully this cannot happen …

Go check the 7 elements of contract .. pay particular attention to acceptance ….

http://tnsradio.ning.com/forum/topics/official-offer
Continue reading

The Census – Danny Asks – New Video

Have added Dannys latest telephone conversation with Matt to the original post.

Matt does not agree with our right to not doing something at our own expense. Surely then there is a legal authority proving his belief? Or maybe statute can be made up on the spot?

There is a long pause when asked if the “implied right of access” to your property is removed and …!


EDIT: I wrote this in reply to a comment but will add it here so that it isn’t missed:

For anyone unfamiliar with “implied right of access”, I understand it as this:- your home and surrounding land is your PRIVATE PROPERTY and anyone wanting to enter your private property needs your consent to do so. No consent equates to trespass. In order for mail, milk, parcels etc to be delivered and for tradesmen, friends and family to visit you at your home, for CONVENIENCE there is an IMPLIED right of access, otherwise everyone would need special permission.

You could if you wish create a notice granting access to everyone except – and then list of those to whom access is denied; religious canvassers, voter registration canvassers, sales people, utility canvassers etc.

I don’t know of any specific laws or judgements regarding implied right of access (EDIT: Armstrong v. Sheppard and Short Ltd [1959] 2 Q.B. per Lord Evershed M.R.), if anyone reading does I would be very grateful if you would let me know. Also, what is the process for bringing a prosecution for trespass? Do YOU set the amount required for damages?

Census – An Acceptence to Contract

I received a visit yesterday from a canvasser regarding the census. I was quite surprised that he knocked considering the notice attached to my door (see below). I was actually asleep when he called, and on being awoken by my better half, all bleary eyed and brain somewhere else, I forgot to video him and caution him. It doesn’t matter anyway, because after being asked “by what authority must I answer your questions at my own expense?” he said he was going to fill his form in as a refusal (which I never did) and this in itself will be written proof that as a representative of the ONS he accepted my offer of contract “by performance” on their behalf. They now have 40 days from yesterday to prove their authority to make demands not specifically legislated against.

Anyway, today I sent the three letters (again see below) to Ms Jil Matherson and I’ll be posting any replies.

Monday 11th April 2011

Dear Ms. Matheson

In December 2008 (http://thesecretpeople.wordpress.com/lawful-rebellion/) and by the authority enshrined in the Magna Carta (1215) I followed in the footsteps of Lord Ashbourne, The Duke of Rutland, Viscount Massereene & Ferrard (as Lord Oriel) Lord Hamilton of Dalzell (http://thesecretpeople.wordpress.com/lawful-rebellion/lawful-rebellion-the-peers/) and entered into Lawful Rebellion. This is a right that everyone is obliged to exercise when the monarch violates her Coronation Oath … and clearly she has.

Clause 61 demands “together with the community of the whole realm, distrain and distress us in all possible ways, namely, by seizing our castles, lands, possessions, and in any other way they can, until redress has been obtained as they see fit…

For the avoidance of doubt as to the validity of the Magna Carta and it’s power to endure over time:

Lord Renton: My Lords, before the noble Earl sits down, perhaps I may mention one point in relation to his fascinating speech. He suggested that we should amend Magna Carta. We cannot do that. Magna Carta was formulated before we ever had a Parliament. All that we can do is to amend that legislation which, in later years when we did have a Parliament, implemented Magna Carta.

Earl Russell: My Lords, the noble Lord is of course correct in relation to present legislation. However, 17th century Parliaments treated Magna Carta, in its 1229 version, as being an Act of Parliament. I spoke loosely and I hope that the noble Lord will forgive me.

http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/lords/2000/jul/20/football-disorder-bill#column_1208

Since becoming aware of the declining standards and moral behaviour of our “representatives” and, finding the need to protect both my family and myself from the policies of those people that force unacceptable and unnecessary levels of invasiveness to our private lives, I became a beneficiary of the ICHOR Trust (see www.ichortrust.co.uk) which exposes those that cannot prove the authority they claim to possess.

I’m sure that you appreciate my position whereas your census canvasser seemed to not have to capacity to!

At 4.15pm on Sunday 10th April 2011, a census canvasser knocked on my door and commenced to ask a series of questions. As per the notice attached to my door (see attached notice) I asked him “by what authority must I answer his questions at my own expense?”. I was informed that if I didn’t answer his questions he would record a “refusal”. At no time did I refuse to answer his question and any record implying that I did is a wilful lie. As he couldn’t provide proof that I must answer his questions at my own expense and, that he knocked on my door disturbing my peace and, that he read and commented on the notice which is in plain view, he accepted the terms and conditions outlined in the ICHOR Trust contract “by performance” on behalf of ONS. He was also knowingly trespassing on private property.

I am not legally trained though I DO know right from wrong. I do believe that to stay silent on matters such as this only gives justification to those with a mind to, to take advantage of that silence.

 

Yours sincerely,

The Occupier.

Continue reading

Rise Up – by thommo

Read more of thommos poems on his site Conspoetry.com

Rise Up
By thommo

Let’s take back control and regain our power,
as the revolution grows to a beautiful flower.
Throughout our history they’ve been viewed as the beast,
but are they are saviours those of the Middle East?
After a century of suppression they finally have snapped,
and the wave of uprising on our shores has lapped.
Inside we all know this world’s upside down,
as we labour like slaves for the sake of the crown.
We’re acting like sheep and keep following in herds,
the banks lead the way with their fraudulent words.
The government we elect is still controlled by the banks,
who else lends them the money for our aircraft and tanks?
To pay the banks back is an impossible task,
about money creation is the question to ask.
To take back control we must stop this fraud dead,
the best way to do that is to cut off the head.
Re-issue a currency that’s backed by our land,
distributed equally as united we stand.
The business of politics has become so corrupt,
so wind-up this corporation and declare it bankrupt.
Set ourselves free and do it in peace,
the need for more war at that moment would cease.
We don’t need all these rules to guide us through life,
they’re there to enslave us in this tension and strife.
Our people are speaking it’s starting to get loud,
kettle us in and still we’ll stand proud.
If we all started marching at once to the city,
those in control would cower in self pity.
20 million is a third of our power,
with no violence just peace they’d cave in by the hour.
So let’s RISE UP together and show them who’s boss,
Our future is ours so what is our loss?
The Scots once invaded and marched from the north,
it’s that kind of spirit we need to bring forth.
With Facebook and Twitter the message would fly,
how quick would the elite make our internet die?
I dream of the freedom that I feel in my heart,
the reset button pressed so we get a fresh start.
Let’s learn from the mistakes that we made in the past,
and create a future in which our freedoms all last.

http://www.conspoetry.com/rise-up

Money Out of Thin Air – Another “Official” Source

Financial Services (Regulation of Deposits and Lending) Bill 2010-11

Douglas Carswell describes how BANKS LEGALLY OWN YOUR MONEY ONCE IT’S LEFT IN THEIR CARE and, use it to create money OUT OF THIN AIR!

I didn’t know they ACTUALLY owned it, did you?

Keep up to date with the bill: http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2010-11/financialservicesregulationofdepositsandlending.html

Continue reading

Corrupt Judges Void the (Imaginary Social) Contract

We trade our natural freedoms “IN RETURN” for access to the protection of the law. When that access is denied, then the contract is broken and all bets are off. There is no obligation for one side to fulfil their part when the other refuses to.

Above, I’ve condensed the point of my previous post and this one to it’s essence. There is NO rational argument against it, it would be illogical to try, and to try would mean you were trying it on and not acting rationally.

Buuuutttttt … if you think you have a good one I’d like to hear it.

In my previous post I explained the reason for confirming a judges intention with regard to your having equal access to the Law.

Just to be clear, none of this is my opinion or theory, all is easily verifiable.

This post is a continuation from the last and will explain why it’s important that, for a society to function as it should, judges must act in the prescribed way. One of the results of their failure to act accordingly has been labelled Lawful Rebellion.

The quoted text will refresh your memory as to what the Law is about. I’ll continue where that text leaves off.

The reason for asking a judge for confirmation that he considers himself still bound by his oath of office is to ascertain beforehand, the honesty, fairness and integrity that that stranger “intends” to display during the course of the hearing. Remember, this stranger that holds enough power over you with the potential to disrupt your life and your remove your liberties.

That’s it, plain and simple.

“Am I going to be treated in the prescribed manner by you and, am I getting access to the Law that I’m entitled to by my having given up some natural freedoms?”

To understand why this important you must first understand what you probably haven’t been taught about society and laws and agreements.

In our natural state there are no laws and no rights and as such each and every one of us has the ability to do and act in absolutely any way that we wish. This is all well and good until (taking it to the extreme) some big hairy arse comes along with his mates and does as he wishes and enslaves you or kills you.

So in the past, agreements were made, set in Law and enforced that curb our natural right to do SOME THINGS as we wish. This leaves us to enjoy our individual lives while exercising our remaining unaltered absolute right to live it by doing as we naturally see fit.

I quote William Blackstone … again.

The absolute rights of man, considered as a free agent, endowed with discernment to know good from evil, and with power of choosing those measures which appear to him to be most desirable, are usually summed up in one general appellation, and denominated the natural liberty of mankind. This natural liberty consists properly in a power of acting as one thinks fit, without any restraint or control, unless by the Law of nature: being a right inherent in us by birth, and one of the gifts of God to man at his creation, when he endued him with the faculty of free will. But every man, when he enters into society, gives up a part of his natural liberty, as the price of so valuable a purchase; and, in consideration of receiving the advantages of mutual commerce, obliges himself to conform to those laws, which the community has thought proper to establish. – William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England.

Once these Laws are made it’s the job of the judge listen to and make judgements when there are disputes and allegations of wrong doings. This position as you would expect requires the holder to be of impeccable character and hold the highest moral standards and unshakeable integrity. There can be no lesser qualifications for a position in society of such importance.

Continue reading

The Reason Why and, How To Confirm a Judges INTENTION to Act Under His Oath … Or Not!

Update:
Further authorities have come to my attention with regard to the conduct of a judge. The authorities listed on Veronica’s site here http://contempt.fmotl.com/ come from Archbolds no less.

“The due administration of justice requires first that all citizens should have unhindered access to the constitutionally established courts of criminal or civil jurisdiction for the determination of disputes as their legal rights and liabilities; secondly, that they should be able to rely upon obtaining in the courts the arbitrament of a tribunal which is free from bias against any party and whose decision will be based upon those facts only that have been proved in evidence adduced before it in accordance with the procedure adopted in courts of law; and thirdly that, once the dispute has been submitted to a court of law, they should be able to rely upon there being no usurpation by any other person of the function of the court to decide according to law. Conduct which is calculated to prejudice any of these requirements or to undermine public confidence that they will be observed is contempt of court” – Lord Diplock in Att-Gen v. Times Newspapers Ltd. [1974]

So what’s the only way to find out before hand of a judges intention to meet these requirements?

ASK HIM!

And if he refuses?

Refusal is a calculated obstruction and so, a contempt of court, a broken oath and, a broken contract.

Small update:
As mentioned below, a judge does not carry an oath and he does not have to repeat the oath that he took.
The reference below should make this clear:

7 Penalty on not taking required oath.E+W+S+N.I.

If any officer specified in the schedule hereto [F6or any member of the Scottish Executive]declines or neglects, when any oath required to be taken by him under this Act [F7or section 84(4) of the Scotland Act 1998] is duly tendered, to take such oath, he shall, if he has already entered on his office, vacate the same, and if he has not entered on the same be disqualified from entering on the same; but no person shall be compelled, in respect of the same appointment to the same office, to take such oath . . . F8more times than one.
Source

… though I don’t see the problem with asking him to confirm his intention to abide by his oath. Surely an honest judge would have no problem with that?


 

Judicial oath
“I, _________ , do swear by Almighty God that I will well and truly serve our Sovereign Lady Queen Elizabeth the Second in the office of ________ , and I will do right to all manner of people after the laws and usages of this realm, without fear or favour, affection or ill will. ”

Anyone that’s been around lawful rebellion sites will have come across accounts of people attending court for one reason or another and asking/demanding the judge to “produce your oath”.

Why? Do these people have a screw loose? Are they just repeating “freeman” dogma? “Oh I heard thats what you have to say and the judge has to produce it or else … blah, blah, blahhhhh”

What a load of old cock!

And it just goes to show how little a lot of people understand about thinking for themselves and probably more importantly how to interpret what they learn using common sense.

How does one “produce your oath”?

Is your oath a physical object?

Does one carry an oath in ones wallet?

Maybe some carry theirs wrapped in a fine silk handkerchief to be whipped out on request?

STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID STUPID

STUPID!

Did I mention that I think it’s stupid? :)

I’ll explain exactly what is being requesting and why, and “a” correct way to put the question that leaves no question as to the integrity of the judge.

The reason for asking a judge for confirmation that he considers himself still bound by his oath of office is to ascertain beforehand, the honesty, fairness and integrity that that stranger “intends” to display during the course of the hearing. Remember, this stranger that holds enough power over you and has the potential to disrupt your life and your remove your liberties.

That’s it, plain and simple.

“Am I going to be treated in the prescribed manner by you and, am I getting access to the law that I’m entitled to by my having given up some natural freedoms?”

To understand why this important you must first understand what you probably haven’t been taught about society and laws and agreements.

Continue reading

The Census – The Law – Your Private Rights

The rule of law, as described in this treatise, remains to this day a distinctive characteristic of the English constitution. In England no man can be made to suffer punishment or to pay damages for any conduct not definitely forbidden by law; every man’s legal rights or liabilities are almost invariably determined by the ordinary Courts of the realm, and each man’s individual rights are far less the result of our constitution than the basis on which that constitution is founded. – A.V.Dicey, Law of the Constitution (1915)

census regalis [royal revenue]. – William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England.

Census means revenue eh!

There are a few things about law/rules and rights that I’ve come across over the past couple of years that when thought about, give the common man a nice little trump card to play when unacceptable demands are made of him by authorities claiming to have so called “authorities” to take away your “absolute rights”.

Bare in mind though, I’m not legally trained (and might have some detail arse about tit) but have just taken an interest because of the appalling “State” of things.

Please take your time to comprehend the quoted text laid out below because and understanding of what’s written is fundamental to your knowing what the law originally intended. You’ll also recognise how much its been perverted. Also, you’ll need this knowledge to make sense of what I’ll say later!

English law dictates that (while exercising a duty of care!) we the people are free to do what we like so long as there isn’t a law or a rule preventing it.

William Blackstone sums it up nicely.

The absolute rights of man, considered as a free agent, endowed with discernment to know good from evil, and with power of choosing those measures which appear to him to be most desirable, are usually summed up in one general appellation, and denominated the natural liberty of mankind. This natural liberty consists properly in a power of acting as one thinks fit, without any restraint or control, unless by the law of nature: being a right inherent in us by birth, and one of the gifts of God to man at his creation, when he endued him with the faculty of free will. But every man, when he enters into society, gives up a part of his natural liberty, as the price of so valuable a purchase; and, in consideration of receiving the advantages of mutual commerce, obliges himself to conform to those laws, which the community has thought proper to establish. – William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England.

Continue reading

Arrested for “running indoors”?.

Update 07/04/2011:
As you will see on clicking play, the video has been removed due to “government censorship”.

But hey ho, you can’t hide THE TRUTH when it’s determined to show itself.


Video proof of more police blatant lies ie. BULLSHIT!!!.

The claim was that Rusty was arrested for assaulting the policewoman. Clearly the video evidence speaks for its self (2:05 in).

[Edit] Where’s my manners! – Thanks suedenimon. http://nominedeus.wordpress.com/2011/03/08/a-present-to-rusty-well-done-m8

Common Law vs Statutes – Living by the Rule of Law

Here’s a five star article by The British Constitution Groups Roger Hayes that’s well worth a read if you want to learn something … spread it around. 8)

Common Law vs Statutes

Living by the Rule of Law

by Roger Hayes

Few of us would disagree that the world would be a better place if we all lived by the rule-of-law – but can the same be said about living by the rule of statute? The writer thinks not.

In making the case that ‘the law’ benefits our society as a whole but ‘statutes’ benefit special interest groups and have become a negative factor in our lives let me first put forward my views as to what the differences between laws and statutes are. Here follows a summary of my interpretation of the differences (not necessarily in order of importance, sometimes repeated and definitely not exhaustive) – please feel free to challenge me if you disagree.
Warning: My assumptions are based on my own logic and reasoning – I have the benefit of not having been ‘trained’ to think like a barrister or a solicitor – in fact I have not been ‘trained’ to think like anybody – I tend to think for myself, which it appears very few people do these days… most preferring it seems to being ‘guided’ conveniently to the same conclusions as the ruling elite – some might call it brainwashing, I wouldn’t be so rude. I invite you to think for yourself and make your own conclusions as to whether you think my assumptions are correct.

The basis of my thinking is that no individual on this planet has the right (or authority) to tell any other individual what to do unless they have given their consent. We are governed by consent. But we give our consent unwittingly – and that is how they control us. Withhold your consent and you take back control of your life.

Continue reading

To Be Governed …

To be GOVERNED is to be watched, inspected, spied upon, directed, law-driven, numbered, regulated, enrolled, indoctrinated, preached at, controlled, checked, estimated, valued, censured, commanded, by creatures who have neither the right nor the wisdom nor the virtue to do so.

To be GOVERNED is to be at every operation, at every transaction noted, registered, counted, taxed, stamped, measured, numbered, assessed, licensed, authorized, admonished, prevented, forbidden, reformed, corrected, punished.

It is, under pretext of public utility, and in the name of the general interest, to be place under contribution, drilled, fleeced, exploited, monopolized, extorted from, squeezed, hoaxed, robbed; then, at the slightest resistance, the first word of complaint, to be repressed, fined, vilified, harassed, hunted down, abused, clubbed, disarmed, bound, choked, imprisoned, judged, condemned, shot, deported, sacrificed, sold, betrayed; and to crown all, mocked, ridiculed, derided, outraged, dishonored.

That is government; that is its justice; that is its morality.

General Idea of the Revolution in the Nineteenth Century, translated by John Beverly Robinson (London: Freedom Press, 1923), pp. 293-294. — Pierre-Joseph Proudhon